NPR Forgets Important Facts Regarding Michael Brown

NPR reports the "News."

Grok Offers this description of an excellent documentary I viewed: "What Killed Michael Brown?" Well worth watching:

What Killed Michael Brown? (2020), written and narrated by Shelby Steele and directed by his son, Eli Steele. Below is an overview based on available information:

Overview

What Killed Michael Brown? is a 1-hour, 49-minute documentary that explores the 2014 shooting of Michael Brown, an 18-year-old Black man, by white police officer Darren Wilson in Ferguson, Missouri. The incident sparked nationwide protests and became a pivotal moment for the Black Lives Matter movement. The film challenges mainstream narratives about the event, particularly the "hands up, don’t shoot" slogan, which it argues is a "poetic truth" not grounded in evidence. Instead, it presents a perspective rooted in Shelby Steele’s conservative viewpoint, emphasizing personal responsibility and questioning systemic racism as the sole explanation for Brown’s death. Key Details

* Director: Eli Steele

* Writer/Narrator: Shelby Steele, a Hoover Institution fellow and noted conservative author who argues that systemic racism is more a strategy than a truth.

[More . . . ]

Continue ReadingNPR Forgets Important Facts Regarding Michael Brown

Two Ways Pharma “Tests” Vaccines to Hide Vaccine Harms

Brett Weinstein explains:

So if you have something dangerous and it's in the shots to do some job like activate your immune system so that it reacts to the the core ingredient of the shot, if it's dangerous but it's in the control and the shot that's being tested, let's say it kills one in 100 people. This is an extreme case, but let's just say that the adjuvant were to kill one in 100 people. Well, if the adjuvant is in both the control and the treatment group, then what the experiment will show is that there was no increased tendency towards death if you got the shot, because it was also the harm was also done to the control group. That is one way of hiding harm.

The second way to hide harm is for pharma always tries to hit this target where something that it is testing against a quote, unquote placebo, which isn't one, is so good that it becomes immoral not to give it to the control group. And so what they do is they rush to vaccinate the control group, thereby stopping the capacity to see what the long term effect of the thing that you were testing is on that population, because you have no one to compare it to because everybody's now had it.

Continue ReadingTwo Ways Pharma “Tests” Vaccines to Hide Vaccine Harms